by Salman Rushdie
As you may know, I recently finished reading the whole of Don Quixote – yes even book 2! Phew!
As I was slowly slowly reaching the end, I heard about Salman Rushdie’s new book: Quichotte. I thought this was the perfect coincidence to discover this new to me author, I know I know, it’s about time.
I have listened to some conferences by him, I especially remember one where he talks about the books that were important in his life. I was awed by his vast culture, and he reminded me in that respect, and with his humor as well, of Umberto Eco, who used to be a close friend of his.
I’m really glad I went into new territory and read Quichotte, here is why:
First, I was totally blown over by the first pages of the book. I loved its humor, and satirical view of our society (mostly American, British, and Indian) and culture – though I’m not sure Rushdie would even dare use this word in reference to our modern age. However, it’s not satire for the mere fun of it, and that’s probably why it worked for me (I usually don’t like satire).
This is more like a tragicomedy, a warning signal, highlighting signs of the end times (in the After Google age!) at the moral, political, and social levels, because of our doings or not doings. And then our efforts to look for another planet to escape to, when we have finally wrecked ours.
“Is that what you believe,” Son asked him, “that life is meaningless and we are turning into animals without morality?”
I’m going to start looking out for those people. The ones like me with the end time in their eyes.
Let’s just say, just say, B.G., which is to say, Before Google. The world before the birth of the monster the Internet became, before the age of electronically propagated hysteria, in which words have become bombs that blow up their users, and to make any public utterance is to set off a series of such explosions. Our age, A.G., in which the mob rules, and the smartphone rules the mob.
Now to go more into the plot. This Quichotte is not crazy with chivalry books, but with TV shows.
“Television is the god that goes on giving,” he [Quichotte] said.
He did what he always did at moments of confusion or crisis. He stayed in his room and watched TV.
And the love of his life, which will launch him on his journey, is a television talk-show superstar. Like Dulcinea though, Miss Salma R has no idea first who Quichotte is, and who knows if she will reciprocate his feelings.
Then, the book gets more complex, with more layers added, and some readers may be tempted to give up at this point. Please, don’t!
You realize we are dealing with a book within a book – which I thought was an awesome way to do what Cervantes did, especially in Book 2, and in the many meta-literature passages throughout his work – as you may remember from my notes on Don Quixote, I was fascinated by this aspect, and it works just as well here.
But then layers multiply, with some on Quichotte, some on his author, Sam DuChamp, who also wrote spy novels (which leads to another subplot), some on Sam’s family, and sometimes they combine, blurring the boundary between fiction and reality, within the novel itself.
I estimate that you’re telling the reader that the surreal, and even the absurd, now potentially offer the most accurate descriptors of real life.
He fell victim to that increasingly prevalent psychological disorder in which the boundary between truth and lies became smudged and indistinct, so that at times he found himself incapable of distinguishing one from the other, reality from “reality,” and began to think of himself as a natural citizen ( and potential inhabitant ) of that imaginary world beyond the screen to which he was so devoted, and which, he believed, provided him, and therefore everyone, with the moral, social, and practical guidelines by which all men and women should live. As time passed and he sank ever deeper into the quicksand of what might be termed the unreal real, he felt himself becoming emotionally involved with many of the inhabitants of that other, brighter world.
What’s also really neat, is that you realize the book is so much more than a modern adaptation of Don Quixote (NB: like the classic, each chapter title contains a description of what that chapter is about): his Sancho is actually his son (yes, Daddy Q, lol, has a son), and the way he came to life is a direct allusion to Pinocchio – with many more references to this other classics all along.
Their journey cannot but make you think of Dante’s Divine Comedy, The Canterbury Tales (incidentally, other amazing classics I read recently in my 50 classics challenge), or The Odyssey. I also noticed references to Moby Dick, and of course to Being There, by Kosinski.
The book is packed with tons of cultural references, from TV shows, movies, sports, music, ads, social media, the big Pharma (another important part of the plot), and many more fields, and I’m sure I recognized only a few!
Big themes are obviously present, such as for instance our stance towards mortality (is it also a message on Rushdie himself?), the environment, immigrants, guns, and terrorism.
The death of Don Quixote felt like the extinction in all of us of a special kind of beautiful foolishness, an innocent grandeur, a thing for which the world had no place, but which one might call humanity. The marginal man, the man laughably out of touch and doggedly out of step and also unarguably out of mind, revealed in his last moment as the one to care most about and mourn most deeply for. Remember this. Have this above all in mind.
Zap. News channels. Normal is guns and the normal America that really wants to be great again. Then there’s another normal if your skin color is the wrong color and another if you’re educated and another if you think education is brainwashing and there’s an America that believes in vaccines for kids and another that says that’s a con trick and everything one normal believes is a lie to another normal and they’re all on TV depending where you look, so, yeah, it’s confusing. I’m really trying to understand which this is America now. Zap zap zap.
This is all done in a very lively style and tone, that made me chuckle all along.
From time to time, the author tries something different at the level of writing, for instance in the hilarious passage on the different types of snoring (in chapter 9). Though it’s less funny if you see it as an image of our current general boredom.
The book seems to me like a tour de force to describe our shallow entertainment society. This was brilliant to use the basic story of a famous classic to do so. I also feel I only scratched the surface of the book. Like for Don Quixote, the author (Rushdie) alludes to the state of mind of his hero, but making the question more complex than for Cervantes: is Quichotte crazy, or just confused because of the craziness of our world?
VERDICT: Brilliant take on Don Quixote. Tragicomedy on our society and where it’s going.
HAVE YOU READ THIS BOOK?
Who is your favorite book by Rushdie?
SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS IN A COMMENT PLEASE
In full compliance with FTC Guidelines, I received this ebook free of charge from the publisher through Netgalley. I was in no way compensated for this post as a reviewer, and the thoughts are my own.
I’m drooling over your review, I’m going to gobble up this book.How ingenious of Mr. Rushdie, yes, when I read DQ I think how similar we are in our culture to the 17th century, more than to the Victorians or the Enlightenment. Our times are wild, and a we are centuries that have a before and an after.
I’m going to LOVE this book. But it’s going to be my January treat.
All the references… like Cervantes book that references so many of the knight books, and even other contemporary authors and poets. Pinocchio, Moby Dick, this is going to be SO MUCH MY BOOK. I’m elated. And my apologies. That interview will come. I do have a bit to say about all I see in Cervantes’s book. There’s a challenge to what’s reality and what’s fantasy. It’s a whole new proposal that challenges the traditional conventions, and Cervantes’s deals with morality too, or code of conduct, etc. and exposes the hypocrisy and disconnect of his times. And it seems Rushdie has drunk from all that and his work has DQ inside its womb.
I’m so looking forward to your review of Quichotte. I have read very negative reviews of it, but I guess if you have not really read DQ and miss most of what’s going on here and there, of course you won’t like it. But YOU have the background to get it, and your review is going to be so much fun! Yes, I think you are in for a treat!!
No worry for the interview, take your time
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think your review is fabulous too. Literature, (not just good books), is always this way. Maybe when we read a contemporary we forget. We need context. Maybe not so much that we have read ALL the author references to, or the tradition he plants his/her feet at, but in conversation with other ladies who blog and read, they showed me how much, for example, Donna Tartt roots herself in Dickens. If we don’t know this, and haven’t read Great Expectations, for example, our appreciation or enjoyment of the contemporary authors’s work could be severely compromised.
If we don’t hear the HUMOR (in Cervantes, Jane Austen, Rushdie, and others, probably all authors who write tragicomedies), we won’t endure specially the lengthy books.
Reading Moby Dick I believe I love it because my familiarity with the Scriptures and some of Melville’s world in terms of religious and some cultural tradition, may be key to enjoy him.
With Cervantes, it’s Shakespeare’s comedies structure, Chaucer, pastoral poems, the knight’s code of honor, and maybe familiarity with landscape and Spanish prototypical people what makes the book humorist and accessible.
I want to type about DQ so bad. Hopefully this weekend.
Thanks so much for your comments Silvia, they are always so enlightening. It’s neat to see how contemporary writers jump on the shoulders of giants of literature to see and create further
Wonderful review! You made me want to read the book right now. But I think I will tackle Don Quixote first. You have inspired me.
Yes, I think Quichotte will be much more enjoyable if you read DQ.
Ive seen another review (forget whose blog it was) which was from someone who had completely different reaction to yours, Sounds like one of those books that divides opinions
Yes, I have seen a few, also in vlogs. But more official reviews in newspapers and the like, tend to appreciate it more
Fantastic review! Love when a reader’s e enthusiasm sparkles through the review!
Thanks for your comment. I hope you like it as much as I did. But I think you need to (re) read Don Quixote to fully appreciate this book
Pingback: Don Quixote: interview with Silvia Cachia | Words And Peace
Pingback: 2019: September wrap-up | Words And Peace
Pingback: The top 7 books to read in June 2021 | Words And Peace
I had an old illustrated adaptation of Quixote back at home, always thought him an idealitic though affable fool. Tragicomedy is indeed what it was. Rushdie’s take on Quixote? He does take the road less travelled.
I was really impressed by Rushdie’s take on it
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: The top 7 books to read in July 2021 | Words And Peace
Amazing review. Now that I have read it, I can join you saying how much I have loved this book. It’s a great accomplishment, very modern and also such a classic. I agree, its references and meta allusions are endless, I caught only a few as well. I know Vonnegut and Calvino are influences and there’s references too. I was also enamored by his ability to write so deep with humor and make the flow feel so effortless.
So glad you resonated with the book and with my review! Have you read anything else by him? This week, I will publish my review of his latest collection of essays. What a brilliant mind he has!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read Midnight’s Children, actually I listened to it and it was brilliant too. I am looking forward to reading more by him. I like Rushdie.
Thanks for your opinion on this one!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Book review: Languages of Truth | Words And Peace
Pingback: The Satanic Verses: buddy-read/read-along announcement | Words And Peace
Pingback: The Satanic Verses: read-along, pre-read discussion | Words And Peace
Pingback: The Satanic Verses: questions on Parts 3 and 4 | Words And Peace
Pingback: Ficciones, by Jorge Luis Borges: Pierre Menard, Author of Don Quixote | Words And Peace